Monthly Edition Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In Political Opposition Against the European Super League, Why? Monthly Edition Share Yeongho Jeong, Hyundo Jung, Jaehun Jung, Gyumin Kim, Seun Kim, Jeongwoo Lee 2023/02/05 Works Cited > News 0 02/05/2023 A fan of Chelsea FC condemned a fan of Liverpool FC for spending only $66 million during the recent transfer window. A fan of Chelsea FC proudly proclaims that they have spent $630 million in the first two transfer windows. Although football fans might be delighted by the signings of new players, many experts and CEO of other football clubs are alarmed by the immense spending by Chelsea FC. The U.S. and Europe sports leagues have disparate systems and economic models. For instance, the U.S. soccer league does not have a relegation and transfer fee system, As the system of transfer fee does not exist in the U.S. sports league, it eliminates the need for the U.S. sports team to make an aggressive investment. Instead, it allows the U.S. sports team to become self-sufficient and successful with revenue earned from broadcast fees and ticket sales. Prospects and young players join a team through a draft system. Furthermore, the absence of a relegation system reduces the pressure on the U.S. sports team to make progress within a year. The Europe football league experiences extreme competition within the league due to relegation. Since the European football league has had relegation from its past, the competition and standing of football clubs have become immensely important. Therefore, European football clubs spend high transfer fees to purchase top players as they are allowed to purchase a player who is on a contract with another team by paying a transfer fee to another club; new players can join a new team every transfer window. However, in recent years, the number of transfer fees that football clubs pay has significantly increased due to the high demand for players caused by the extreme competition but also the financial loss that the European football league had during the pandemic when spectators were not allowed and the league temporarily suspended. Despite the extremely high transfer fee, clubs like Chelsea FC, Manchester City, Newcastle FC, and Paris Saint-Germain F.C. which is owned by a billionaire, are spending millions of dollars to win the league. For instance, as mentioned above, Chelsea FC alone spent $630 million in the first two transfer windows and signed Argentina midfielder Enzo Fernandez for $131.4 million which was a British record fee. However, Chelsea FC stands in 10th place in the premier league. For other teams to compete against clubs owned by billionaires such as Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud or Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan who are willing to invest millions of dollars, they are also pressured to spend significant amounts of money to compete against them. Therefore, the extreme emphasis on competition in European sports leagues creates a structure of sports leagues where the standing of teams will solely depend on the investment and jeopardizes the establishment of a stable and self-sufficient economic model. Nevertheless, in April 2021, twelve ‘Founding clubs’ (AC Milan, Arsenal, Atletico Madrid, Chelsea, Barcelona, Inter Milan, Juventus, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Real Madrid, and Tottenham Hotspur) launched the European Super League which was a league composed of top clubs from different countries within Europe. The establishment of the Super league was an attempt to Americanize the European football system. Unlike the UEFA Champions League which determines the competitor through the standing of the domestic league, the European Super League had fifteen permanent top clubs permanently qualified. The closed system would allow top clubs to generate and dominate profit instead of spending significant amounts of money to compete for qualification to the UEFA Champions League. However, within 48 hours of its announcement, the European Super League collapsed with strong opposition from fans of the domestic league, UEFA, and the British government. As competition has been a tradition within the European sports league, there was strong opposition against the European Super League which allowed only top clubs to dominate the profit and discarded the unqualified clubs. The strong opposition that the Super League faced in Europe reveals how the element of competition within different clubs are highly emphasized in Europe than in the U.S.. The open system of the European football league has allowed the league to become more popular and competitive. However, the extreme emphasis on competition and standings has created teams to compete through the investment and spending of players. To compete against each other, the clubs are spending significant amounts of money despite the severe inflation after the Covid-19 pandemic. Perhaps, the standing and championship of a football club are now purchased rather than earned. $5.52 billion marks the entire payroll of the National Football League; $3.83 billion marks the entire payroll of Major League Baseball. $1.97 billion marks the entire payroll of the EPL. The highest-paid MLB player is Max Scherzer, with a 2023 salary of $43.3 million. The essence is, sports are becoming one of the industries with the most valuable transactions. Professional sports have become a means of entertainment since their popularity surged during the 1920s in the United States. Across the Atlantic Ocean, in Europe, the popularization of modern professional sports dates back to the eighteenth century. As interest in sports in the United States and in Europe grew, companies and sponsors have utilized the athletic market to shape their business models. The different policies in varying sports leagues caused the formation of varying business models. The notion of relegation is a major factor that creates different structures in sports leagues. Relegation is the transfer of teams between different leveled leagues based on a team’s performance. Professional baseball in the United States is divided into different leagues based on performance level: the rookie league, low single-A, high single-A, double-A, triple-A, and the Big Leagues. The teams in the Big Leagues are each categorized as individual organizations. Per se, the New York Yankees is an organization. Minor League teams are affiliated with a Big League team, ergo the lower-tier teams are under the ownership of the Big League teams. This eliminates the need for relegations, as underperforming players would be demoted to the Minor Leagues. In European leagues, such as the EPL, three out of twenty teams are relegated to a second-tier league, and three teams from the second-tier league are promoted to the Premier League–a first-division league. Hence, for teams to avoid such relegation in this structure, it has become inevitable to spend excessive European Euros or English Pounds. The team with the highest payroll in the EPL is Manchester United F.C., with a total payroll of $255 million. When comparing the two teams with the highest payrolls in the MLB and the EPL, the New York Mets’ payroll–$335 million–outnumbers that of Manchester United’s–$255 million, as aforementioned. It clearly seems logical to assume that European leagues would invest more in sports, especially under the direct pressures of relegations. One distinguishing factor in the business models of sports teams in the U.S. is yielding the naming rights to corporations to extend their revenues by a substantial amount: the higher the revenue, the more funds that may be allocated to investments. For instance, the Rams and Chargers of the NFL received $625 million dollars in exchange for yielding SoFi the naming rights of their stadium for a 20-year span; this is the largest stadium naming rights deal. As it is the human instinct to seek entertainment, sports provide enjoyment in a way no other media does. The professional sports industry is growing at a steady pace, and it is thus important to answer ignorant questions such as, “Why are athletes and teams so overvalued?” In 2021, April 18th, the European Super League (ESL) was proposed to be a new football league featuring some of the biggest and most successful clubs in Europe, such as Real Madrid, Barcelona, and Juventus. Those teams in the ESL would compete against each other in a closed league separate from traditional domestic leagues. This idea of matching some of the biggest world-class clubs on a weekly basis was expected to generate significant amounts of revenue through broadcasting rights, sponsorship deals, and ticket sales, but it was met with opposition from politicians and football governing bodies. One of the strongest reasons for the opposition to the European Super League was the negative impact it would have had on national leagues, like the English Premier League (EPL), the Serie A, and the La Liga. Many politicians and governing bodies felt that the ESL would take away the importance of national leagues, and would eventually make the national leagues lose their supporters and fans. This would have a negative impact on local communities, as many of the smaller clubs would experience a financial crisis from the lack of supporters and revenue. One of the strongest voices against the ESL, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson stated, "The plans for a European Super League would be very damaging for football and we support football authorities in taking action. They will strike at the heart of the domestic game, and will concern fans across the country." The potential damages that the European Super League could do to the national leagues are especially concerning for politicians like Boris Johnson because many of them strongly consider local economic growth in order to keep their position and be re-elected. The politicians and the government intervene with the economic activities to prevent economic failures and maintain the economic growth. However, the establishment of the super league would cause a great impact on the local economic growth and probably lead to an economic failure, damaging all the politicians’ prestige. So that is why for the politicians, the European Super League is a big threat to their positions. Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Monthly Edition Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” Robinson About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In How should ethical concerns in generative AI (bias, transparency, accountability) be addressed? Bias in generative AI arises from the data that it collects. Since most AI systems get information from datasets collected from history, they often inherit inequalities and prejudices. As Georgia Tech’s scholars note, “If the data reflects historical biases or injustices, then the systems that are trained on that data will do the same” (Georgia Tech). Fixing this needs careful checks of the data, more diverse teams designing AI, and ongoing reviews to make sure the results stay fair and balanced. Transparency, meaning being able to see and understand how AI makes decisions, is just as important. Many algorithms work like black boxes, giving results without clearly showing how they got them. The Georgia Tech article emphasizes that users affected by AI generated decisions deserve explanations that are “interpretable and easily communicated.” Without transparency, it becomes impossible to identify where an AI system may be reinforcing bias or producing harmful outcomes. Finally, accountability means knowing who is responsible when AI causes harm. The article explains that although there are some voluntary rules, strict laws are still uncommon. The article points out that while voluntary guidelines exist, enforceable policies are still rare. Governments and institutions must establish clear governance frameworks that define who is answerable for errors, misuse, or discrimination. It’s also important to ensure that people affected by AI have ways to challenge decisions and get fair treatment. Depending on how it is used, generative AI is neither good nor bad in and of itself. Developers, leaders, and users must collaborate to ensure that it is equitable, transparent, and accountable at every stage if it is to be used effectively. As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance, so too should our ethical perspectives. 10/31/2025 Share SeoHyeon Kwon Works Cited > News Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” General About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Arts Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” Arts Share Wieroo Park 2023/02/05 Works Cited > News 0 02/05/2023 “American Horror Story and Glee” writer Ryan Murphy's “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” has been breaking records since its initial Netflix release on September 21st, as the second most-watched series on the platform right behind “Stranger Things 4.” Despite the massive backlash the show has been amassing on social media platforms such as Twitter and TikTok, and this trend still seems to remain positive. It's not a surprise that a show about one of the most infamous serial killers in history has gone viral, similar to the success of the 2007 film “Zodiac” by David Fincher featuring Jake Gyllenhall and Robert Downey Jr. based on the investigation of the Zodiac Killer, or Joe Berlinger's 2019 “Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile” with Zac Efron and Lily Collins, telling the story of American serial killer Ted Bundy–both being equals to Dahmer when it comes to global infamy. Yet, with the first few episodes of the show “Dahmer,” director Ryan Murphy's attempt in differentiating the show from pre-existing true crime television becomes apparent. After a few episodes on the upbringing of Jeffery Dahmer and his alleged childhood trauma, the show completely shifts focus from telling the life story of a killer to Dahmer’s victims–more specifically, the 16 men of color he murdered. Halfway through the show, we begin to see glimpses of the respective lives of Konerak Sinthasomphone, Anthony Hughes, Jamie Doxtator, and more of whom he killed. Despite having a profound interest in the realm of true crime and having heard the story of serial killer Jeffery Dahmer, I had no clue of who his victims were, how they lived their own lives, and how their families were treated after watching “Dahmer.” Especially with the depths this show explores with the issue of race, police prejudice and being LGBTQ+ between the 1970~1990s, this show seemed to shed light on “why” Dahmer wasn't caught earlier than he did, rather than “how” he did at all. This was the general consensus found between the wave of criticism the series had been receiving. With that being said, the Netflix series has tanked in audience reception, and received mixed reviews from critics. The primary concern for many viewers has been the fact that neither Ryan Murphy nor Netflix consulted the families of the victims of Jeffery Dahmer when creating the series. The series is "re-traumatizing Milwaukee's black LGBTQ+ community," Alexandra Jane from Yahoo!Life writes, as she continues to point out the irony in the series striving to shine light on the victims' stories while failing to even try to obtain basic consent to do so. Other viewers point out the uncomfortableness of the show's uncannily-realistic depiction of Dahmer's crimes, calling it to be "gruesome" and "disturbing". To this, I could say that I stand with the notion that many of those claims are reasonable and justifiable, but only to a certain extent. There is no word other than 'inconsiderate' when describing Netflix's approach in tackling a true crime case with surviving families of victims. Especially with the fact that several families of victims were strictly opposed to their relatives' death being turned into yet another TV series, the show becomes an exploitation of the victims' trauma. Still, I can't help but to wonder what legacy the show “Dahmer” might have left in the world of true crime media, only if it was done the right way. For one, it seems the widely-criticized gruesomeness of the show is what has been needed in true crime media for quite some time. When “Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile” made its 2019 Netflix debut, many were quick to point out the lack of "realness" shown in the film, as there were barely any scene of Bundy's crimes in action, such as the brutal killings and sexual assaults he eventually got charged for. Such circumstances led to the portrayal of Bundy as a charming young man who charmed his way through the American judicial system despite ending up on death row. It also put fuel to the fire of Bundy's supporters, most of whom were young women who saw a twisted attractiveness in his demeanor and looks. Yet, with “Dahmer” and its outright portrayal of Dahmer's crimes, the show continues to be criticized, but this time for being "hard to watch" or "too disturbing". To this, I say that there is no fine line in which true crime media has to walk in order to avoid such feedback. It seems crucial that more audiences should realize that; yes, the show portrays borderline unwatchable, hyper-realistic images of brutal killings and assault–yet that's what makes criminals such as Dahmer or Bundy such terrible individuals who should not be receiving anyone's support. While in recognition of the number of audiences who have went on to supposedly "romanticize" Dahmer and those who blame the show for causing such, “Dahmer” and it's terribly raw, real, and violent depiction of crimes which were just that goes on to remind us that perhaps it is the twisted audience at fault, rather than the show and its honest depiction of a serial killer. This, combined with the aforementioned emphasis the show puts on Dahmer's victims, is what makes Netflix's “Dahmer” a hard one to watch go. Objectively speaking, it is a great show with top-tier cinematography and a radical understanding of what true crime should be–perhaps it could be considered one of the best true crime media of the 21st century. Yet, the sheer extent of disapproval it's been receiving from the victim's families makes the show out to be one built upon exploitation under the name of acknowledgment. Off-the-record, if this show may be of intrigue, I suggest watching it on pirated websites instead of giving Netflix the streams it already has more than enough of. Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Arts Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” Robinson About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Opinion Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In Review of The Sun Also Rises by Ernest Hemingway Opinion Share Seohyun Jang 2023/03/11 Works Cited > News 0 "The quintessential novel of the Lost Generation" could not have been more fitting as a description of Hemingway's first book 'The Sun Also Rises; a navigation between the lines of morality and love in the 1920s. Hemingway has risen to the list of classical authors through his distinct style of writing; objective, terse, emotively flat, and most of all, the deliberate 'coming-together' of the plot towards the end. A reflection of this writing style, this novel follows the story of Jake Barnes as an expatriate in Paris and Pamplona, remaining one of my top favorite books despite its evident flaws. This novel was the first ever Hemingway I've read–and to be completely honest I expected another boring, forcefully 'deep' writing–and to some extent, it was. The novel started off as a mere repetition of drinking, conversing, and arguing with the author introducing a never-ending list of complicated characters. It's basically a cycle of socially unavailing expats roaming around places to talk about cynical, hedonistic views while drinking. It was strictly uneventful with indiscernible human relationships; the first 30 pages being almost unbearable to read. Nevertheless, throughout the progression of the book the plot was subtly established as Jake tries to win Brett's interest in a way unprecedented in other protagonists. It was the acceptance that interrelation with Brett would lead to doom, the serpentine characterization of Brett, and probably the most memorable 'romantic' ending I'll ever witness in my lifetime that stunned me for a month after finishing this novel. I loved the intricate, deliberative details, I liked the graphic, emotive expression of Spanish bullfighting, and I enjoyed an unusual shift in Jake's characterization, which I won't say for the sake of not spoiling. Most of all, it caught my attention that it introduced a new perspective of history–an objective background of the 1920s, a rare copy of a non-glorified observation. It may be 'pessimistic' but in itself it holds the truth of distress people felt after World War I. . It historically reveals the start of an immeasurable capacity of human destruction, an agonizing memory of seemingly never ending tragedies; accentuated by Barnes' background as a WWI veteran. Subsequently, there are many observations stating Jake Barnes as an 'alter ego' of the author Hemingway. Barnes is an intellectual journalist portraying the infamous ideas of Hemingway. It shows how people lost purpose, meaning, and significance of life post-WWI. Lady Brett Ashley must be one of my favorite characterizations so far, a conventional femme fatale in the 1920s. Indubitably glamorized being written by a man, but coming with the realization of her own flaws, the character was gorgeously constructed–an ahead-of-his-time portrayal of somewhat realistic hyper-feminine characters. Upsettingly, I cannot gloss over the saturation of anti-semitic, homophobic, racist and misogynistic basis in the novel. In Jake's point of view; Jews are unbearably violent, women should fit into an unreachable standard, domestic abuse isn't even a big deal, and only people who risk their lives are making the 'best' of their lives. Barnes notably reflecting the views of the author himself, it is safe to say Hemingway's world view is undeniably limited and ignorant. He gives a role to every identity and sticks to it–a man is a man, a woman is a woman, a Jew is a Jew. Such wrongly biased ideas are so entrenched within the author that their connotations are hard to ignore throughout the book. This novel confuses me. The experimental, intelligent writing amazes me, but the ideas the author expresses is horrifying. Surprisingly, I would rate it a 10/10. Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Opinion Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” Robinson About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Business Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In How DNA Traces Down Global Supply Chains Business 0 In San Joaquin Valley, California, cotton manufacturers spray billions of DNA molecules onto batches of freshly woven cotton. These DNA molecules travel everywhere, from Indian yarn factories to Costco shelves worldwide. American businesses check for the DNA's presence to ensure their cotton has not been replaced by cheaper Chinese yarn, banned for forced labor. Amid growing concerns about abuses of global supply chains, the use of DNA tracking technology has significant consequences. By March 2023, U.S. companies identified a billion-dollar worth of shipments suspected of illegal trading. Legal officials advocate for customer rights by strengthening laws that explicitly outline the protocols for product withdrawal from China. All companies must prove their goods are free from forced labor in their creation process before displaying them on market shelves. If not, those goods may be seized at the border and detained from entry into the U.S.. Along the same line, customers have become increasingly interested in the authenticity and ethical production of high-end products, such as diamonds, organic cotton, sushi-grade tuna, or Manuka honey. This has led companies to need to explain where every piece of their product comes from, not just ensure that they are free from forced labor. To the public, it may seem simple, but it's not as easy as it looks. Over the past decades in which they have developed their businesses and produced goods, international supply chains have become highly complex in attempts to reduce costs or diversify product offerings. Fewer sources come from local areas; thus, tracing every section of their supply chain will take time and effort. Especially for large enterprises operating upon multinational platforms, it is nearly impossible to identify source origins, as they are sponsored by thousands of suppliers worldwide. Each of these suppliers, in turn, relies on hundreds of other companies to maintain their business - and so forth, the supply chain becomes a bowl of spaghetti. That is why DNA comes in handy. Some companies use scientific methods to tag their goods, using synthetic DNA tags. These tags do more than leave a mark on products; by sequencing the DNA or analyzing isotopes after traveling, experts can quickly determine rainfall, latitude, temperature, or soil conditions of the regions the products traveled in. Other companies use digital databases or artificial intelligence to create extensive maps of transportation or to detect unusual trade patterns. Of course, criticism exists: skeptics argue adding these features to daily products will elevate manufacturing costs, a significant change for retailers under thin margins. Furthermore, concerns about digital safety still arise today, as hackers can easily break down internet-based systems, hiding the truth about specific products. Transparency in global supply chains is crucial for both customers and companies, with researchers prioritizing finding adequate solutions to address this issue. As businesses continue to adopt new technologies, it is likely that DNA tracking and other forms of technology will play an increasingly important role in ensuring that products are produced ethically and sustainably. 2023/04/23 Share Jian Chung Works Cited > News Business Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” General About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Magazine Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In Giorgia Meloni, the New Face of the Far Right Magazine 0 Extreme right politicians were, most of the time, unsuccessful in the past. People of Europe weren’t convinced of the specific ideology brought up by extremists, heavily relying on their previous political beliefs and dependence. However, after living in such an unpredictable and unstable world, after encountering numerous social problems and wrongful tips of the global economy, there has been a change in some people’s minds. They no longer hope for a world of pure democracy and peaceful standings. These actions of pursuit have caused a rise in the emergence of extreme right politicians, especially in the continent of Europe. It inevitably appears to cause a change in various fields and areas of the EU. Not just changes but harmful modifications. Dominant economies of the EU primarily prioritize ideals such as freedom, equality, or internationalism. It means that their beliefs hold the opposing status to those right-wing extremists. Conflicts can be resolved through discussions and tolerances, but they will still cause a threat to those dominant economies since they no longer have as much public support. It will be challenging to maintain their dominance and power as the emergence of the new-colored people will bring small but significant changes in their minds. These changes may seem healthy and idealistic for society, but it doesn’t always benefit the primary economies of the EU. The extreme right has risen to be the major political force in France and has become the second-largest party in Sweden. Also, it is the largest party in the ruling coalition in Italy. At the center, Giorgia Meloni, from Brothers of Italy, became Italy's first female prime minister and the first extreme-right leader to take power since World War II. The extreme-right force, previously regarded as the periphery of politics, has been reborn as the mainstream, now establishing itself as the ruling force of Italy, the third-largest economy in the Eurozone. The factor that the right-wing coalition won is complex, but it is analyzed that the worst inflation had given a decisive impact on the vote. Italy saw consumer prices rise 9.0% in August from a year earlier, continuing their surge following 8.4% in July. Italy's far-right forces made the most of voters' frustration in the election campaign, including soaring energy and food prices and reduced purchasing power. The rise of far-rightism across Europe can be seen as adding to the negative factor of the Ukrainian war and the burden of living costs caused by soaring prices. The failure to control inflation has left European citizens dissatisfied with their government and the European Union (EU) system. After all, the revival of extreme-right forces associated with populism is seen in European society, and a potential threat obscured by economic problems will come. To fully investigate the potential threat the emergence of extreme right politicians may pose to the dominant economies of the EU, one must first discern the doctrines of the extreme right. One major characteristic is that they tend to marginalize social minorities, by applying a majority vs. minority dynamic. Following the same train of thought, the characteristic economic model of the right-wing is neoliberalism. Such a mindset especially stands out when it comes to immigrant policies. Minorities, especially immigrants, are being targeted as the ‘enemy’ of the European economies. The fear of these new demographics stealing the old’s places is dire. In extreme right-wing governments, subsidies for immigration integration are significantly cut. This not only includes accepting refugees but also cutbacks on the funds for education and training for immigrants who have already settled in these countries. In Belgium, where 16.5% of its population are first-generation immigrants and 13.7% are second-generation immigrants, immigration over the last five years had a positive impact on GDP, increasing it by 3.2% (The Economic Impact of Immigration in Belgium). In most countries of the EU, the economy heavily relies on the immigrant workforce. Policies by extreme right-wing governments ostracize immigrants, only making the integration of immigrants into the labor market harder. This outcome is the direct opposite of their objective to stop spending taxes on immigrant policies. Although prioritizing its citizens may have its advantages and necessities, one must be aware that the prime reason why human beings formed a society in the first place is to safeguard one another’s rights. Namely, the objective of the social contract was to establish a system in which people treat others equally, respecting each other’s sanctity. Thus, one must not fall into the trap of believing one’s self-interest is the top priority. 2023/10/23 Share Mina Cho, Hanbin Choi, Junhee Han, Gyujin Kim, Jinho Kim, Junsik Kim, Minyong Kim, Seojin Lee, Naeyong Park, Yebin Song Works Cited > News Magazine Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” General About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Weekdays, Month Day, Year 00 °c Log In Economics/Politics Korean Doctors Walk Out of Hospitals After Government Proposal Economics/Politics Doctors protesting near President Yoon Suk Yeol’s office in Seoul (Jeon Heon-Kyun/EPA, via Shutterstock) 03/03/2024 Share Claire Kim Doctors protesting near President Yoon Suk Yeol’s office in Seoul (Jeon Heon-Kyun/EPA, via Shutterstock) South Korea’s medical system, world-renowned for its affordability and excellence, finds itself facing an existential crisis. Patients are seeing their pre-planned operations canceled and emergency cases are experiencing long waits for an ambulance, with one elderly woman dying of cardiac arrest after no hospital had space to treat her (Park). The medical emergency is the result of Korean doctors protesting at a government proposition to increase the number of students who can be admitted to its medical schools from 3,000 to 5,000 starting next year (Jin). The government argues that the move is necessary as the country has just 2.6 doctors for every 1,000 citizens compared to an OECD average of 3.7 (Park and Kim). Doctors, particularly trainee doctors, argue that the government’s decision is misdirected since the shortage is limited to a minority of medical sectors. Claiming to already suffer from low salaries and harsh working conditions, the trainee doctors believe increased supply will make their situation even worse. Interns are resident doctors who are said to work up to 80 hours a week for just $3,000 a month (Jin). When online and street protests failed to sway both public and government opinion, trainee doctors – who make up about 50% of the workforce at major hospitals – decided to submit their resignation letters. At first, 6,415 doctors walked off the job, and while several hundred have since returned, there is still a significant shortage which has caused the government to announce a medical emergency (Korea Joongang Daily). Meanwhile, the government is refusing to back down with the Korean president, Yoon Suk Yeol, saying that “it is impossible to justify collective action that takes people’s health hostage and threatens their lives and safety.” (Jin) The government added that those who failed to return to their posts by the end of February would lose their medical licenses and face large fines. That deadline has come and gone with no offer of a resolution from either side, and the government is yet to take definitive action. With public support aligning with the government, it is unlikely that the government will bow to the doctors’ demands; however, the doctors are also defiant in their position. This means the situation is likely to drag on which leaves the medical system vulnerable and the public at risk. Works Cited Boram, Park. “Cases of Patient Damage from Doctors’ Walkout Pile up | Yonhap News Agency.” Yonhap News Agency , 26 Feb. 2024, https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20240226006700315 . “Over 6,000 Trainee Doctors Resign as Korea’s Medical Crisis Deepens.” Korea JoongAng Daily , 20 Feb. 2024, https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2024-02-20/national/socialAffairs/Over-6000-trainee-doctors-resign-as-Koreas-medical-crisis-deepens/1984657 . Park, Ju-min. “Explainer: Why Are South Korean Trainee Doctors on Strike Over ...” Reuters , www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/why-are-south-korean-trainee-doctors-strike-over-medical-school-quotas-2024-02-21/ . Accessed 3 Mar. 2024. “What to Know About the Doctor Protests in South Korea.” The New York Times , 29 Feb. 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/29/world/asia/doctor-strike-south-korea.html . > News Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” General About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Weekdays, Month Day, Year 00 °c Log In Monthly Edition Tech CEOs in Hot Water-A debatable necessity Monthly Edition 02/19/2024 Share Daniel Jo Recently, on January 31, 2024, the CEOs of Tech giants were brought forth to a Senate hearing in America. Presided by the U.S Senate Judiciary Committee, these leading businessmen were brought under hot water for about four hours, with Senators especially vocal regarding the harm that these Tech platforms had brought.With even Zuckerberg apologizing to the audience present in the chamber, it does seem that some of the concerns posted by the committee are indeed valid. One hot topic was the harm caused to children via the Tech platforms. Indeed, as Senator Lindsey Graham said, the executives had “blood on their hands.” With millions of underage children, and under the age of 13, having accounts on platforms such as Facebook and Tiktok, the possibility for them to be exposed to harmful content is rising up drastically. With cases of online child abuse, such as sexual exploitation, harrasment, bullying, and such, exposure to harmful content like suicide, decline in mental health being more numerous then ever before, the Tech companies have a lot to answer. For one, Toney Roberts’ 14-years old daughter Englyn committed suicide after being exposed to such content on instagram(). Another case would be that of 17-years old Jordan LeMay, who also committed suicide after falling to an online scam calling for sexual images in social media. Although the top Tech giants constantly assert that their platforms are not marketed to children under 13, and that potential underage users are prohibited from joining, the reliance is low. For example, TikTok was fined about $15.9 million for allowing more than one million underage users to join in Britain in April 2023. Similarly, in America, 33 state attorneys general sued Meta-company which Facebook and Instagram belonged to, for letting millions of underage children join the two platforms. Such accusations extend to the violation of data and privacy protection of minors. With increasing concerns that the platforms themselves, that have promised to protect minors, exploiting them for profit, ‘Freedom of Speech’ can be, indeed, sidelined for the moment. In conclusion, with several lawmakers pushing for the proposed Kids Online Safety Act to ensure online safety, it does seem like that some guidelines at the very least, are needed to balance the intricate line between Freedom of Speech, and the protection of minors online. Works Cited Isaac, Mike. “Six Takeaways from a Contentious Online Child Safety Hearing.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 31 Jan. 2024, www.nytimes.com/2024/01/31/technology/tech-senate-hearing-child-safety.html . “‘It Was Forced’: Grieving Parents Unfazed by Sorry Tech CEOS at US Senate Hearing.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 1 Feb. 2024, www.theguardian.com/media/2024/feb/01/parents-tech-ceos-us-senate-hearing . Isaac, Mike. “Child Safety Hearing: Senators Demand Tech Executives Take Action to Protect Children Online.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 7 Feb. 2024, www.nytimes.com/live/2024/01/31/technology/child-safety-senate-hearing? action=click&pgtype=Article&module=&state=default®ion=footer&context=breakout_link_back_to_briefing#yes-millions-of-children-under-13-have-social-media-accounts . > News Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” General About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Science Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In Science ESG’s Risks in Investing World Science 12/15/2023 Share Yuju Jang "ESG" is "Environmental, Social, and Governance," which are three key factors that measure the sustainability of investment in a company or business and its impact on society. Many companies use ESG to reduce the adverse effects on the environment and culture, and ESG is becoming a significant part of it. However, ESG is dying in the corporate and investing world, and I'll explain this in detail. For the first point, there are concerns about greenwashing. Greenwashing refers to the act of a company producing a product that adversely affects the environment while still putting on an eco-friendly image through advertisements. There are risks of some companies greenwashing their products so that environmentally conscious investors and consumers who want to buy environment-friendly products will be attracted even though those products are not actually environmentally friendly. Without sufficient verification processes of ESG, those bad companies would make claims about their ESG company behaviors. This would make investors need help to determine which companies are eco-friendly. These overall risks would damage the reputation of ESG concept investing. Investors might be skeptical and suspicious about putting ESG on their decisions if those degrading kept processing. Also, the skepticism of investors would negatively affect the ESG. Some investors would think about financial returns if they put ESG in their decision-making. If there is a negative effect of ESG on their profit-making, they will hesitate to incorporate the ESG concept into them. Those ESG would benefit from long-term sustainability, but this might be the same as the lack of short-term positive effects for their financial positive effects. For ESG, the reporting for the investors might need to be more consistent and standardized, which makes it hard for investors to collect the data for their financial performance. These would cause investors to be more focused and believe in traditional financial metrics than ESG criteria. So, it would be hard to incorporate ESG. Hence, as ESG has a lot of risks like greenwashing or investor skepticism, it would make ESG die in the corporate and investing world. Works Cited > News Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” General About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Politics Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In Politics Donald Trump’s indictments being denied and claimed DOJ ‘weaponised’ by his rivals Politics 12/15/2023 Share Jeongseo Park Political quarrels continue as the presidential election is coming forward in November 2024. While Donald Trump, the so-called frontrunner, has been indicted by the DOJ(Department of Justice) four times, Trump claims it was an interference by Joe Biden. This claim was illuminated by the interview by Univision, highlighting the fever of the upcoming presidential election. Also, Joe Biden has lost his supporters DOJ has charged Trump in Florida, Washington, D.C., New York and Georgia. In an interview with Univision, Donald Trump said, “If they do this – and they have already done it – but if they follow through on this, yeah, it could certainly happen in reverse.” therefore, he noted that he would do the same thing when he is reelected as a president: ‘weaponizing DOJ.’ This reveals the tension between the frontrunner and the current president, Joe Biden. Trump subsequently showed hostility against Joe Biden, stating, “What they have done is they have released the genie out of the box. You understand that. They have done something that nobody thought would happen.”. Nevertheless, Trump’s case regarding the 2020 election subversion has not been immunized despite Trump’s immunity argument to the federal court. The case is one of Trump's indictments by the DOJ. Therefore, it was one of Trump’s attempts to reveal his guiltlessness regarding the case. However, as the federal court has rejected his argument, it seems unfavorable for Trump to win the election in November 2024. Likewise, the fever of the presidential election is getting hotter, and the political conflicts seem endless. The tension between Joe Biden and Donald Trump is getting intensified. While Trump is constantly claiming that his charges are intentional to attack Trump and get his chances of being reelected, the federal court does not agree. Trump’s attempts to get away from the indictments must be the priority for Trump to win the race. Works Cited > News Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” General About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Opinion Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In Interview with Liberty in North Korea’s Ilhwa Choe: Escaping North Korea, Finding Freedom Opinion Share Gyumin Kim 2023/03/11 Works Cited > News 1 2023/03/11 The Robinson Review was invited exclusively to a valuable interview session held by the organization LiNK–Liberty in North Korea–with a North Korean guest who fled her fatherland during her youth. LiNK is a nonprofit organization that strives to ensure the natural rights of the North Korean people, making efforts to elevate the privileges of North Koreans to be on par with those of people around the world. They support the fleeing of North Koreans via a confidential route - exceeding 5000 kilometers - without financial requirements. The organization holds approximately 290 clubs across 16 different countries, which already gathered $570,000 in terms of fundraising. Choe, possessing a North Korean origin, explained her early life in her hometown, Musan, a small town adjacent to the Chinese-North Korean border. Hence, her view of North Korea is limited, as she has experienced less than a percent of what her country offers. Choe explained: similar to her situation, other North Korean residents, too, have a bounded perspective of their own country. People not originally from North Korea tend to generalize their perceptions of North Korea, establishing stereotypes, especially regarding politics. Choe, as a North Korean, believed in the vitality of the guarantee of natural rights–the rights to listen to music, watch movies, read novels, travel, et cetera. She thought her limited privileges were unjust, which influenced her to flee her home country. After successfully emigrating from North Korea, now a member of LiNK, Choe now works as a supporter of North Korean defectors. She is making efforts to eradicate stereotypes of North Korea and assists the defectors to better adapt to the environments of South Korea. Currently, LiNK supports approximately 1300 defectors by offering support curriculums, including basic education and foreign languages. The Robinson Review appreciates the efforts of LiNK and will continue to make meaningful collaborations with other clubs and organizations. Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Opinion Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” Robinson About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.

Business Tuesday, December 23, 2025 00 °c Log In Business Jessi Becomes Embroiled in Contract Termination Rumors With More Vision Business 12/15/2023 Share Dongha Kim The rumor of contract termination between Jessi and More Vision has been a hot issue in South Korea. This rumor has shocked many internet users, as it has only been nine months since they signed the contract. However, the company has been silent about this rumor without any official announcement about the following news. With the prolonged state of time without official announcements, fans have been persistent in revealing the state of matters or knowing the truth. Jessi is an American artist who has debuted and done most of her work in South Korea. Since she has Korean parents, she is also called Hyunju Ho, which allowed her to trace back to South Korea, where she is doing the work's prime. She first debuted with her single album Get Up in 2005 as Jessica H.O. However, her first debut as a musician lasted only a short time. She showed up in the media once again 2015 from the TV program 'Unpretty Rapstar", a competitive rap star survivor program, 2015 and showed her potential as a rapper, winning second place. Then, with her name Jessi, she began her career as a singer and rap star and earned great success. Not only as a musician, but she has also had great success as an entertainer by being part of different TV programs, such as 'Six Sense' and 'Amazing Saturday.' Jessi recently released her single album 'Gum,' which seemed to appear in official broadcasting events. She was complimented for her new styles, which were quite different from when she was in P-nation, Psy's entertainment. Her new songs went viral, and people were astonished by her changes. However, after 'Gum' was released, with the cancellation of Music Bank, one of Korea's most famous music programs, a bone of contention was mentioned: the relationship between the entertainment and Jessi. Although More Vision has claimed that it was due to Jessi's lousy condition, Jessi has canceled other performances after this incident, which seemed doubtful to many of her fans. Because the rumor of discord seemed clear after Jessi canceled a few schedules and with the confession of some relatives of the entertainment saying that there had been conflicts between Jessi and the entertainment, Jessi and Jay Park posted their Instagram story, claiming that there was not any problem in between their relationship. However, when Jessi was invited to Jonathan's YouTube channel, owned by Congolese Koreans, she confessed that she did not like both of the entertainment -- P-nation and More Vision -- which made people believe the contract termination rumor. While no official announcement is being made, internet users and her fans blame Jessi for being irresponsible with her schedule and not actively participating in official entertainment events. On the other hand, some of her fans worry about Jessi's upcoming career as a musician since she experienced different hardships along the way to becoming a famous musician. Many people are waiting for the official announcement from the company and to hear how Jessi's career as a musician will continue. Works Cited > News Robinson Review Favorites A Review of Alternative Bottleless Water Ooho Dongha Kim Three Reasons Why the U.S. Shot Down the Chinese Spy Balloon Seunghyeon Lee How Truly Significant Is the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank on the U.S. Economy? Songi Chai, Yubin Cho, Seohyun Jang.. Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights As the Birth Rate Issue Emerges in China, CNN’s Recent Report May Shine Light on a New Vision of Politics Seoun Kim The New Fossil Fuel: Lithium Yubin Cho Yubin Cho Trending on Robinson Review As Economic Growth Slows, Retail Sales in March Decreases Joe Biden's Signing of the Respect for Marriage Act Becomes A Turning Point in the Fight for LGBTQ+ Right Vaseline on Your Face? Four Tips That Others Don’t Know The Controversy Behind Netflix “Dahmer–Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” General About Us Staff Events My account Popular sections Politics Economics Science Arts Other sections Opinion Magazine Games Contact Us Contact Us Social media Advertise With Us COOKIE PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © Robinson Review 2023. R and ‘Robinson Review’ are trademarks of Robinson Review. Robinson Review and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the Robinson Editorial Code of Practice.